Sunday, August 31, 2014

Exceptional Leadership


Could the difference be any more obvious?  Yesterday I wrote about President Obama and his near infinite reservoir of what America can not do.  No longer is she the shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan saw, but according to President Obama she is a shack with a burnt out light bulb.

For my friends who enjoy history you will keep in mind that today is the 211th anniversary of Meriweather Lewis pushing off from Pittsburgh Harbor.  The expedition was called the Corps of Discovery and was commissioned by President Jefferson.

The goals were simple.  After the Louisiana Purchase, Jefferson wanted to find the most practical traveling path across the continent for purposes of commerce.  He also wanted to deny the world powers (Europe at the time) the opportunity to make a presence in the New World.  A secondary objective of course was to provide a scientific information about the plants and animals encountered on their adventure.

When Jefferson looked out of the White House he saw a vast land of rich resources and able bodied people.  They had defeated a world power and earned their own rights to freedom.  When President Obama looks out though he seems to see a cup half full.  A people unable to life themselves up and a country whose resources are finite.  He seems to misunderstand that natural resources are dynamic and not a static asset.  He leads from fear whereas President Jefferson seemed to lead his nation from hope.

The second lesson I consider when I think about the Lewis and Clark Expedition is the leadership those two men must have had.  Theirs was a three year trip and it was not long before they were abandoning their boat to move cross country - up mountains - and through forests and fields.  How hard must it have been to map a continent at that time, much less to lead men, across it.

When I think of today that is the leadership I hope for from my brethren here in the United States.  The idea that we can accomplish much if we only go for it.  Leadership can come from necessity, but perhaps we as a nation have become too comfortable with our disposable DVD players, our fast food, and our fake money.  Exceptional leadership does exist, but I think we need to look for it a little harder.



Welcome To Waffle House


In perhaps the clearest indication that Marco Rubio is running for President in 2016, he has recently sent a letter to President Obama explaining why the border need be secured before new measures are discussed to provide a pathway to citizenship.

Is this the same Rubio who was championing comprehensive immigration reform...last year?  You know before walking away from it.

Look, I get it.  Signing onto a bill with Chuck Shumer because the Chamber of Commerce or someone told you to is easy to do.  They throw easy smiles, warm hand shakes, and the promises of lots of campaign cash for future...aspirations.  However, you may want to dial 804 real quick and check in with Eric Cantor because being unsure about immigration reform is perhaps more deadly than being pro-immigration.

Instead of having a principled approach that says "immigrants have always been a part of our country and I have no problem with that" you appear to have a nasty political disease called poll-itis.  I realize that for many in the Republican Party immigration is a hard issue.  I understand that allowing in millions more workers will dampen wages for the same working class that should be in our camp, but historically this really isn't any different than times before.

We had immigrants with crazy religious ideas who thankfully mostly settled in Pennsylvania.  You know...the Quakers.  We had thugs of all kinds come over from Ireland and Italy and if this offends you take a look at your own history and the crime we brought over.  It is what it is and like now, all the new folks...dampened wages for those who were already here.

I am not nearly as scared of immigration as some of my colleagues are.  After all, Jesus was an illegal immigrant, running from the persecution of King Herod.  Was he as bad as the folks crossing the Texas border?  Was he any different?  I know, I know...now the Evangelical Christians will be mad too, but I will find solace in Bishop Olsen's commentary on the immigration question.

However, regardless of my personal opinion on the issue, one thing I know is that serving up policy at the waffle house of believing this, that, or the other thing based on the poll of the day is a turn off with both regular and primary voters.  It is not leadership.  It isn't Presidential.

If Senator Rubio is serious about being the Savior of the Republican Party that Time magazine declares him to be he might want to figure out issues before polling and/or move the polls in the direction he leads on, rather than holding his finger to the wind.



Holy Islands


 August 31 is the Feast Day for St. Aidan, the first bishop of Lindisfarne.  It is also the day my third son, Wyatt, was baptized though his saint name is Luke.  Holy Island, or Lindisfarne, is a tidal island off the northeast coast of England. It is the civil parish of Holy Island in Northumberland.

I find the intersection of these two facts both interesting and remarkable: A Holy Island and the Sacrament of Baptism: the anointing with Holy Water.  Islands of course are surrounded by water, but Baptism is about bringing the person, or child, into the Church as a whole.  How can one be brought into a body separated?

The English poet and Church of England priest John Donne tells us that no man is an island.  Donne argued in his Meditation XVII that if any man died, he himself is less, because he is a part of mankind.  Yet, Holy Island is an island.  It is an island where St. Aidan was well known for his homilies and knowledge of scripture.  Like our current pontiff, St. Aidan was also known for his kindness to the poor and distaste for pomp.  It was on Lindisfarne that St. Aidan created a seminary for the training of ministers.

Today, Holy Island offers Church of England services via St. Mary the Virgin, the same namesake as my parish.  (I should note I am not sure if I am offended by the fact that the parish is controlled by the Church of England or not, but I do wonder if they would yield the property to the Roman Catholic Church if they were to come calling for a property first built in the 7th Century AD, i.e. well before a Church of England ever existed.)

In the meantime, I return to the juxtaposition of these two issues.  Lindisfarne is connected at low-tide by crossing sand and mud flats, following an ancient pilgrom's path.  The path is covered during high tide.  The difficulty in getting to the island must be significant and I wonder how the peoples of Northumberland did it.

However, it does help with the other issue.  How often do we only look for the Holy Island - a people set apart so to speak - when our lives are at low tide?  Why is it only at these times we find the path we need to take to find the kindness, humanity, and love that the church can offer?  Donne was right, no man is an island, but why do we have to be at our weakest to find the separate nature that is the Kingdom of God?  Why is it we do not swim in the waters of forgiveness and mercy that is the Church all the time?

These are obviously life long questions and I suspect the answer comes back to my own priest's homily today about the ability to follow God's will instead of our own, but for now I will hope my son does not need to wait for low tide to find his church home's warmth and grace.  It is right there waiting.






Saturday, August 30, 2014

Unexceptional Leadership...Isn't


"Good" news for President Obama.  Recent polling indicates his foreign policy approval rating is only four points worse than his approval rating for how he handles the economy.

The bad news is his approval rating on the economy is at 39.4%.  Ouch!  Foreign policy approval is 35.3%.  That isn't an approval...that is the percentage likelihood that Tony Romo makes it through all sixteen games of the season.  These numbers are not even anemic because they represent the fact that at least some Democrats now realize that President Obama is wrong on issues affecting two core issues to every American: our world standing and our pocketbook.

At the same time his best friends for the past six years, the Washington Post, admits that the recent gaffe at his press conference stings because it fits into people's preexisting suspicions.  I remember Lyn Nofziger referred to the Reagan administration as not amateurs, but novice amateurs.  Well if Ronald Reagan and Company were novice amateurs who the Hell are these kids?

I am not sure, but even the Washington Post Editorial Board took the President to task for the whiplash he must be causing foreign leaders when they hear one thing from his United Nations Ambassador and then hear him contradict her.

The Editorial Board remarks about his comments on both Ukraine and ISIS as well as the abosolute lack of exceptionalism shown by this administration.  This is the bad parent who continually says no instead of offering options.  Instead of speaking about America's greatness and ability to do things, the world seems to have escaped his charm.

Barak Obama keeps talking about American shortcomings.  He has encourages the fires around the world that now burn and no one is to blame for this but himself.  Finally, the media seems willing to explain to this President that unexceptional leadership...isn't leadership at all.  Unfortunately the message will not get out until the next President arrives to put out the fires this guy started.




The Quiet Outrage Over Lamborghini


The outcry is deafening.  I wish they would stop...or start in this case.

Earlier this week I posted about the tragic story of the 9 year old who shot a firearms instructor with the Uzi she was using.  I will leave the arguments for and against that topic in the previous topic, but as expected I immediately heard the calls to ban various firearms.  I have yet to hear anyone cry out for the banning of Lamborghinis after an 18
year old killed himself driving at too high a speed.  (It should be noted that while this was a joy ride, it was authorized and the car owner was in the vehicle too.)

I hope the point is obvious.  We call to ban certain things, but not others.  For instance, guns should be banned, but not Lamborghinis.  We legalize marijuana in Colorado and Oregon, but illegal drugs are dangerous too.  So what do the numbers tell us?

In the United States, firearms account for roughly 32,000 fatalities per year.  What is not indicated in this number though is 60% of these deaths are suicides.  In general I hear no call to make illegal drugs more illegal...just the opposite in fact, but overdose related deaths topped 41,000 in 2011 making drugs more dangerous than firearms...and that is only prescription drugs.  Let me take it a step further and ruin your Sunday football commercials.  You know the constant Sam Adams and Budweiser commercials?  Well, alcohol contributes to 88,000 deaths per year.

I dare you to send a letter to your local NFL team suggesting they cut back on the booze they serve.  I suspect their response will be something about a long walk down a short plank.

My point here is people are quick to jump on tragedy, but when you look at the things killing us in real life numbers no one wants to ban those items because it would deny their freedom.  However, a specific freedom mentioned in the Bill of Rights is discounted because it is politically unpopular.  It makes me a little dizzy sometimes trying to keep up, but maybe I am just dizzy from all the outrage over an 18 year old behind the wheel of a 600 HP vehicle.  For some reason it isn't quite as loud though, but perhaps it should be.




Friday, August 29, 2014

Rick Perry: Forgetful Or Felon?



I am not sure even where to go with this, but I do have to ask, how far has the Republican Party fallen that an indicted sitting Governor of Texas can run for President with any credibility.

As the video notes the mugshot was a "smirking sitting Governor of Texas."  While I get the legal strategy of smiling for the camera so you can now sell campaign t-shirts I am disappointed he takes these charges so cavalierly.

Again, as Stewart's clip notes this isn't a political hit job except that it was a Republican judge who appointed the Republican special prosecutor.  That's right.  The special prosecutor in this case is Michael McCrum was appointed Assistant US Attorney by George H.W. Bush.  In every situation related to this case I can find, Democrats have recused themselves from the case.

I am not a lawyer and to date have not played one on TV or in the movies, but this is the same Governor who couldn't even remember which agencies he wanted to eliminate in a debate a few years ago.  Rick Perry likes to talk about Texas being open for jobs, but he fails to mention the repeated implication of crony capitalism that stains his administration again and again.

This might be an interesting case to see go forward as Mr. Perry always shoos away questions about Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas.  We also get to find out if Mr. Stewart is right.  Is Rick Perry re-branding and going from "forgetful doof to felon."  In the meantime, the Republican Party needs to admit we have better options than this guy or we are all losers.




Learning



So I have a personal affinity for the music of Five for Fighting and I am not sure why I like John Ondrasik and his music more than other musicians, but what can you do? In any case, this being the first week of school I bring you The Riddle by Mr. Ondransik and Company.

For me this is a great song of reflection.  Where are we?  Where are we going?

After the first week of school I suspect all three of mine realize their place in life may or may not be as big as they thought it was. 

Giant world.

Millions of people in their immediate community.
Millions more in their state.
Billions of people on their tiny planet.
How many more planets out there amongst the billions of stars?

In between there are lots of quizzes and test...both in school and in real life.  How do you know which are important?  What is the meaning of life?

Well, according to the lyrics..."a Dylan song, the eclipse of the moon, looking into an angel's eyes."  There is also a great line about the batter swings, the summer flies" which gets me.  How many summers have my eldest and I already lost?  I shouldn't say lost because they were well spent watching baseball, playing catch, going to practice, or playing the game, but wow they go by quick.

I guess I like this song because while we all have our measures of success, he brings it back to a pretty Christian ethic of your relationship with those around you.

Love your neighbor as you love me.  Make your relationships one of support and nurturing and they will work out well.  Become conceited and use relationships only to press gains and bad things happen...you disrupt the natural for your own selfishness.

In any case, I am confident public schools today are not talking about developing and maintaining relationships so maybe we will sit down tonight and have ourselves a nice little, relaxing song tonight and see what they think. 

Go find your meaning in life and I hope you enjoy Friday Night Music as well.



The Citizenship Of Workplace Violence


The Army psychiatrist, Nidal Hasan, accused and convicted of the "workplace violence" murders of thirteen employees by the US Govenment has now asked to become a citizen of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

At the time, many were outraged that Hasan's crimes would be considered an act of workplace violence instead of the terrorism they clearly were.  the US government demurred and chose to not admit this was another act of terrorism on US soil or they would have had to offer up Purple Hearts to those wounded by this act of terrorism.

While the US Department of Homeland Security continues to worry about the domestic terrorism that Christian conservatives who want to practice their faith might bring, they are actively missing acts of domestic terrorism being committed by persons like Mr. Hasan or the Americans who have died and who continue to fight overseas for ISIS.

It might seem that our work is only beginning when it comes to terrorism.



When You Teach Violence, Don't Be Surprised When You Get It


It's Friday, but it seems like it is Freaky Friday.  What is going on today?

More news reports...this time regarding a teacher who thinks it appropriate to make comments in reference to her students including:
  • Wanting to stab them
  • Having an itchy trigger finger
  • Dousing them with hot coffee
Her tweets which have now gone viral have earned her a letter of reprimand, but not a termination.  What?

If a student had said any of these, they would have been on a suspension list if not an expulsion list in moments.  While I am not a fan of these standards, if a school is going to have them, they can not only apply to students.

From the Newark High School website, it's Discipline Policy:

The staff of Newark Memorial High School and the Newark Board of Education believes that one of the major functions of the public schools is the preparation of youth for responsible citizenship.  Newark Memorial High School shall foster a learning environment that reinforces the concepts of self-discipline and the acceptance of personal responsibility. 

How in the world is the Newark Unified School District supporting its own policies when it settles for a reprimand instead of a termination for a teacher who advocates violence against students?

Newark Unified School District on its own website talks about bullying:

Bully . . .

Since the inception of the one room schoolhouse in the 18th Century, bullying has occurred on school campuses across our nation.

Lately, with increased cyber bullying, we have seen an increase of suicides related to bullying.  We can no longer remain on the sidelines holding the notion that, “kids will be kids”.

Laurie Massar wrote in Leadership 2011, “While most administrators and teachers understand the global realities of the problem, the larger problem lies in their ability to recognize bullying on their own campuses.

Congrats boys and girls.  You are the bullies.  Again, their web statement is correct: the larger problem lies in the ability to recognize bullying on their own campuses.  I would say this is the definition of a problem, but they are not turning a blind eye as Laurie Massar refers.  Instead they are acting out a charade of discipline against a teacher.

Mrs. Hodges who has a cute peace symbol on her Twitter byline seems to think it okay to talk about her summer ruined teaching.  Maybe you need a break in teaching Mrs. Hodges.  It is clearly too much for you and your itchy trigger finger.




I Scream, You Scream... (Reprise)


In the category of "Are You Serious?" a baseball player, namely Jesus Montero, should have been ejected for trying to brawl...with a cross checker, a senior level scout, from his own organization.

The media story goes Montero who showed up to Spring Training a hefty forty pounds overweight was coaching first base in Boise for the Everett Aquasox and was told to speed up on his way back to his dugout by the cross checker.

Deadspin reports that Montero who did not respond to the calls of Rapido! Rapido! then had an ice cream sandwich ordered for him by the cross checker and sent down to him in the dugout. At this point, Montero decided to throw the sandwich into the stands and may have held a bat in a menacing way.

Hmmm....so....was he mad it wasn't a banana split or was he mad he was being called out for not managing his weight as you might expect a professional athlete to do?  Despite being banned for 50 games last year due to a PED suspension, Montero did not seem to take the discipline to heart.

For me I do not mind a cross checker busting him for not busting it.  So far, Montero has hardly shown himself to be Major League material despite the initial projections which we now have to presume were PED driven.  Further, he seems to take his current standing as an opportunity to be lazy rather than to push himself every day?  What message does he send his team mates when he is not willing to work the weight off - especially after being shown to be a cheat?

I look at this really simply.  Montero showed up to Spring Training unable to play pro ball because he did not do the things he had to so that he could contribute.  He has ended up on a rehab assignment to the Northwest League where he can't seem to fight his urges at the dinner table, but is more than willing to fight the people who expect him to perform.  Further he isn't in Everett, Washington to play and get in some game time...just to rehab, i.e. he can't even play on a Short Season A Ball team!

I scream and apparently so should Mariners management who traded away an above average pitching prospect for this knucklehead.



Thursday, August 28, 2014

Stories


Let me tell you about the time I went fishing recently.  The fish I caught was so big...

Okay, so in water cooler talk about Ned's latest fishing trip we expect exaggeration.  Without a Facebook picture or other documentation we expect a story that probably over-hypes reality.  It is what it is.  However, when we watch our news networks though, we expect them to still perform at least a minimal level of journalistic activity and verify stories.  Right?  Two examples this week demonstrate that the expectation of journalists doing there job is probably giving them more credit than they deserve.

First, CNN airs what is reported to be audio of the Ferguson, Missouri shooting.



As CNN notes it did not independently verify the recording...it just ran with it.  Again.  I say again because I assume you remember when CNN "broke" the story that the Affordable Care Act had been struck down by the Supreme Court.  CNN now is trying to walk back their exclusive coverage worried their audio may be a hoax.  Woops.

At the same time news reports tell us the University of Southern California Cornerback Josh Shaw admits to lying about saving his drowning nephew from a pool in his apartment complex.  It was only a few days ago they were informing of us that his dual injured ankles was the result of jumping from his second floor flat to help his nephew.


While USC and local authorities continue to investigate, my question is what is it you were trying to do, i.e. how did you really injure your ankles?  Was this some sort of crime or pseudo crime?  Was this just teenage foolishness?  What?  Now we all want to know and since we know your first story is BS I hope the next one is better.

There seems to be a mantra in network news these days that first is better than being accurate and while I do get the idea of breaking news, shouldn't it be close to accurate and/or news worthy?  Any more you get stories coming out: BREAKING NEWS...the former Governor of Virginia may enter a plea.  This isn't news, it's speculation.  BREAKING NEWS...the White House may allow more immigrants to stay in the country.  Here too I get that some of the information we get is via intentional leaks to trial balloon ideas before the public before an actual decision can be made.  You have to check with the oracle known as polling before you can play leader.  (And I blame both Democrats and Republicans and corporate America for this.)  However, there is zero requirement to actually go along with this by journalists.

When did the media give up on their fourth estate rights?  When did they decide they were just going to give everyone a pass?   These are the things that drive me nuts when it comes to network news, but it does allow for some decent parody. 

For those of you who wonder what I might mean, here is Katie Nolan of Fox's No Filter whose weekend story is at least interesting.  (As a disclaimer I will note that Fox too missed the SCOTUS opinion on the Affordable Care Act.)  Maybe the guy in Ferguson and Josh Shaw could take come and get lessons because she is at least interesting.




Enjoy your Thursday and be careful what news you consume.  Let's just say some news is undercooked and may be hazardous to your health.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Movies And Intelligence


So this afternoon being off of work and ahead of a few projects for Never Forget Foundation, I thought I would relax with a bucket of popcorn and some lethality every four minutes.  No I don't mean the news, I mean going to see the latest Pierce Brosnan film, November Man.  For those of you considering the movie I will start with the trailer:



Let me start by saying I love 007, but having a film that is about a former spy being played by a former Bond whose love interest is his previous Bond love interest does make things awkward.  Or schizophrenic.  Or boring....until.

So you will be surprised to note that this movie was filled with spy cliches.

  • Old spy drawn back into the game.
  • Old spy loses one of the people he cares about.
  • Old spy who is hard stays hard...and sad.
  • Old spy walks away from everything...including the cool explosions.
This film has its share of regular murder, drinking, and regular explosions to keep you awake, but other than that the plot line is about as thin as capellini d’angelo.  If you are looking for plot twists you have to wait until the movie is over.  (More on that later.)

Again, this is a film with a quick introduction of the spy who becomes former spy.  He is brought back into the game so that he can help one of the few who he cares about.  He then finds out his former protege killed the one he cared about and the hunt for how and why begins.  Bond formula from here...shooting, explosions, naked girl, moment of reflection, shooting...

It is what it is folks and I didn't walk in expecting much, but if you do want anything out of this film you have to wait until it is forty percent over.  Sorry.  I like Brosnan.  I thought his former spy portrayal in the 2005 movie The Matador was almost hilarious if they didn't have quite the ease they did with the murder of the various victims in that movie.  If you want to see Brosnan doing what he does...let's face it - he could play an old retired spy in his sleep - then go plunk down your money and this movie should hit the minimum expectations which is why I gave it three stars.  If you expect more, you will be disappointed.

Now, as promised, the good part of the movie was when a guy approached me after the film.  I was wearing a FDNY t-shirt to which he asked if I had worked for them.  I answered honestly no, but that I had my various brothers in that and many other departments.  He then went on to tell me about his career in the CIA.

Let me repeat that...he went on to tell me he worked for the CIA.

"I like to watch these films to check them out," he said.  I stood there and nodded politely now wanting to make my way to the car.  He didn't scare me.  While he did outweigh me and had a few inches in height I was pretty sure I could evade any move he had.  I also wasn't worried about a sophisticated recruitment ploy, but I had to ask myself how much schizophrenia could I handle in one day.

The movie had its issues as I outline above, but to now hear a guy who looked like he just left Walmart telling me he was super secret guy and talking about his career in America's super secret agency and his obvious need to validate it via Hollywood made me think I need to start watching rom-coms.  Didn't the CIA make the line "I could tell you, but then I would have to kill you" famous?  I mean look if you are a CIA employee and need to go watch these films....well, have at it, but don't tell me okay.  I may have to shoot you...with a water pistol.




Racist Or Stupid?




Unbelievable.  So post Emmy showcare, people have taken to Twitter to complain about the tribute to Robin Williams with references that he is a racist.

how is Robin racist you ask?  Well he does what many refer to as a racist impression of a Muslim woman in Iran asking for help.

Ummm....have you looked at the Middle East of late ladies?  The politically correct police are once again demonstrating their utter ineptitude when it comes to the state of the world.

The young ladies to the left (and probably happy to sit there) are offended that Mr. Williams would do an improv sketch where he uses a scarf as a headdress as he impersonates a woman in totalitarian Iran.  You know the same place that supports Female Genital Mutilation.  The same place where women do not have the option to not cover their faces?  The same place where a woman speaking out on any issue - not authorized - she might be beaten.  That Iran ladies?

I do get that they are probably children or perhaps young women who are starting out their lives, but is this really the fight they want to wage?  Moreover, who are their friends making these tweets their favorites?

Robin Williams was always working for the little guy, the under dog, but he did so using a right we have in America called the First Amendment.  He used his free speech rights to push the envelope - often uncomfortably for people - and he offended many by doing so, but he wasn't racist.  If you were offended by this you miss the opportunity for comedy to provide a transformative change to policy discussions.  While you might not like Williams' take on stereotypical activity against women in Iran, that does not make it racist.  It must be very convenient to live in a world where you don't see or feel danger because it is all around you.  If anything Williams tried to make an unfortunate situation funny, but he didn't act as a racist.  I wonder if any of these ladies were bothered when Williams started a joke about Pavarotti walking into a comedy club: "Two jews walk into a bar..." or when he pushed at the Roman Catholic Church.  Somehow I doubt it which makes me wonder.  Are they racist...or just stupid?



Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Hot Situations


...as Ferguson, Missouri boiled over last week a common theme was the over reach by local police for their response after the shooting with military grade weapons and actions that violate civil rights.  Tampa, Florida seems to have the other problem though.

According to at least two media reports (local and Washington Post) a Tampa area mother watched as her child got "redder and redder" as he was locked in a vehicle that Tampa dispatchers would not respond to when she called 9-1-1.  It took an off duty police officer to come to her aid by calling a second dispatcher and sending resources her way.

Given the number of heat related deaths per year in the United States I am amazed by the callousness of the initial call taker who said that responders would likely just smash her windows.  That is true...they may.  We knuckle dragging fire types though may also find another way in, but either way, that is a decision for responders who should be on the road immediately rather than waiting for a AAA locksmith to show up.

For me, this ranks up there with the DC Fire EMS scandals of non-response except it may be worse in this regard.  All the call taker likely had to do was press a button and/or speak a few words.  How lazy can you get?  You aren't even doing the real work.

You just need to send people willing to handle the situation and perhaps try to help the mother find ways into the car in the meantime.  I know a number of dispatchers who like to wear their career on their sleeve and talk about "I tell YOU where to go."  Maybe so, but if you act like this call taker did, you deserve to go find a new career.

This is one public safety story that has me hot.



Safety


News reports this afternoon tell the tale of a firearms instructor being shot by a student today.  I have few words to say on this one as I am in shock.

In this case, the shooter was nine and she was operating an Uzi Submachine Gun.  I believe that the firearm has a cyclic rate of 1200 rounds per minute.  I am having trouble computing how long it would have taken to run through a 32 round magazine.

Reports indicate that the child was handling the weapon after her father and it apparently did not have its safety engaged.  For those that argue that their finger is their safety...clearly not in this case.

Obviously this is going to start lots of conversations about guns in our society.  I still remain fervently opposed to government regulation, but...in this case the question has to be asked...why would this instructor pass a gun to a child with the safety disengaged?  Why did the parents even have her out to shoot an Uzi?

No, I don't want the government regulating who can and can not purchase a firearm, but it seems to me when you are trying to educate children about firearms, you start small.  Say a single shot .22 or single barrel shotgun.  Maybe I am wrong, but the results of this were self evidently disastrous to two families.  It makes me wonder who was considering safety.



Could We Or Should We?

An article in the The Independent this earlier this week reviewed the machinations occurring in Great Britain as their Parliament considers whether or not to make mitochondrial donation legal when it comes to In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Though the process or "three parent" IVF was banned by the Food and Drug Administration there has been no public discussion about whether or not the procedure was safe.  Saint Barnabas Medical Center in New Jersey performed the procedures on many of the children currently alive and is studying whether or not there were any long term affects, but has refused comment to those interested in its survey results.  It would seem they are unwilling to share the bad news that their actions did not produce children without healthcare worries, but perhaps transferred new worries to the parents.  After all, if the results were good I suspect they would be ringing the newspapers instead of avoiding the questions like Cindy Lucus who would not answer questions for me or the Independent.


Science seems very comfortable treating children as a commodity.  If you want one, we can provide one.  You do not need to be in a marriage, you do not need to be in a marriage of man and woman.  We can develop a child for you - in the lab.  Perhaps, you would like a tall boy, blonde hair or brown, green eyes, or blue.  Science seems able to make all these decisions for us without questioning the cost.

The cost of course is not just is the procedure safe short and long term, but is it safe from how we view children.  Are they just a commodity that if I produce, but don't want I can dispose of easily?
  The American left loves to talk about caring for children, but again and again, children seem to simply be a commodity.

I can have a child on demand.  My friends who veer liberal also tend to be the first to complain about their child's selfish desires - I wonder if those are genetic too.  Moreover, while it is uncomfortable for anyone to think about, IVF is linked to higher birth defects.  Again, these are the same parents generally who think abortion on demand is okay or abortion to save a child from a birth defect.

Once again, it seems science is ready to take its hand into the world of God.  Once again, it appears that the slippery slope of science (and dollars of course) is more interested than a perfect child than any child.  It was only last week that scientist Richard Dawkins suggested it immoral to not abort a child who had been diagnosed with Down's Syndrome in utero.  Immoral to kill a child because of a disease?  Really?

This is the talk of Adolph Hitler.  Once again the reality is, Adolph Hitler spoke of systematically killing those children deemed "mentally defective."  Here, Mr. Dawkins speaks of the same idea yet he is not ostracized by the scientific community.  Hitler too believed in the mercy decree of allowing people the peace of death rather than suffering through life as "defective."

While the two items seem different, they are not.  In both cases, science wishes to enter the world of creation by adding their two cents.  They believe they can safely create a human being from three person's genetic material, but the issues is not can they, but should they.  Unfortunately, it does not appear that anyone is asking that question.



Monday, August 25, 2014

TV Options


So...still preseason football, so what should I watch other than Monday Night Football.  Well, given my Orioles are in first place in the AL East and have the best lead amongst division winners they have to be on Monday Night Baseball.  Right?

No...well, maybe this Wednesday, ESPN can find room for them on the Wednesday Night game.  No.

Well, what the heck?

Can someone please help me figure out why the Orioles - who are in first place - are not on ESPN, but the Yankees who are still trying to figure out who is playing second base, third base, right field, and left as well as in their bullpen and who are six games back are on both nights?

That's right...the Yankees who are three and a half games back in the Wild Card conversation are playing the division leading Kansas City Royals tonight and Detroit on Wednesday - another team with high hopes, but who are also not a playoff team should the season end today.

What is going on here?  I get that ESPN is enamored with the Yankees and Red Sox, but neither team has done since the All Star Break.  If MLB wants to maintain the few fans it has left, perhaps it should start talking about flexing games into time slots and avoiding the near constant rotation of Yankees, Red Sox, Cardinals, and Braves games and realize there are twenty-six other teams too.




Welcome Immigrants, Natural Citizens Go Away


I am not sure when we made this left turn, but here we go.

A diner in Vermont decided to take part in a local initiative to plant flower beds in the median to prettify the local area I expect.  They were rewarded with a street sign that said "Yield for Sneakers Bacon."  Sneaker's being the name of the local establishment...bacon being what you serve at a diner pretty much at every meal.

So...a Muslim immigrant who lives in the community decided to complain.  Still okay with it...you're allowed to complain...I am not sure why you are personally offended by a sign about bacon.  No one said you had to eat it.

Meanwhile the town's Mayor, Katherine "Deac" Decarreau was quoted as saying “The cool part of living in a diverse community is that it’s not always comfortable.”  Umm, apparently it is very comfortable if all you have to do is say something offends you and you are off to the races.

I don't make it to Vermont all that often, but the next time I am that way somehow I suspect I will be avoiding this place.  After all, sneakers are shoes that were first worn in the inner city.  I am offended that this establishment would find it comfortable to name their establishment after the shoes of at-risk inner city kids.

I am also offended that the city seems unable to do anything with the pornography that is in its local bookstores and is offensive to both me and many other church members.  You see the slippery slope that occurs when you start to control others speech?

Of course this isn't control because the owners were dumb enough to allow themselves into this.  They said they want to serve breakfast, not politics.  Well, you should keep up with the bacon then and leave the bull to others because you just jumped in with both feet.



Sunday, August 24, 2014

Get It Now?


Once upon a time free speech was personally owned by liberals and progressives.  People whose views I disagreed with such as Lenny Bruce or George Carlin, but who made their point about free speech vert well.

It was liberals or progressives who wanted to expand the bounds of speech.  Not so much anymore.

Erin Ching - college student - recently said "What really bothered me is the whole idea that at a liberal arts college we need to be hearing a diversity of opinion."  Ummm, Miss Chang you attend an elitist college with 1500 students that costs more in a year than the three cars my family uses for transport and travel...combined.  You are exactly the person who needs to hear diversity of opinion so you don't become vaccinated against common sense in your own little private protected world of group think.

What does this opinion have to do with terrorism though?  Well, speech has become a sort of terrorism where opposing viewpoints are denigrated.  There can only be conformity according to the former protectors of speech.

Unfortunately, this politically correct group think or group don't-think creates an environment where only one opinion is allowed to exist instead of the exchange of ideas.  In Great Britain there is actually a list of people not allowed to enter the country because of their viewpoints...not their actions, but their viewpoints.

While Great Britain forgets it roots in the Magna Carta and keeps out "hate monger" Michael Savage while not informing anyone which of his views were deemed a threat to national security it seems indifferent to the jihadi-cool system it has helped foster in Britain.

John of the ISIS Execution Squad who recently killed James Foley had a clear British accent and took on the name of John Lennon of the Beatles in an apparent reference to his British roots.  (Wasn't John a peacenik?)  The US Department of Justice has reportedly opened a criminal probe and the Muslim Council of Britain denounced Foley's "abhorrent murder."  What else were they to say though?

You may remember a few years ago the similar attack on soldier Lee Rigby...except that was on the streets of London itself.  It took almost no time whatsoever for the case to move from one of outrage to one of hand-ringing and self-reproach about the Islamophobia that might have caused the murder.  What?  how about these two jihadis had a plan, executed their plan, and went about it in a cold, controlling manner?

That of course might qualify me as a threat to the British state though.  Silly me here supporting their soldiers instead of the criminals who committed an act of home grown violence against their own.  According to news accounts, Ms. Rigby, the mother of the slain soldier immediately turned to thoughts of her own son's execution after hearing of the Foley incident.  Perhaps it was the eerily similarity where Muslim militants where trying to cut off someone's head?

Another news account that quotes a British Member of Parliament informs us that twice as many British born Muslims fight for ISIS (The Islamic State of Syria and Iraq) as fight for their homeland where they were born.  This is outrageous and should show the insidious nature of the opponent we both fight.

While conservatives are mocked for asking questions about the opponent and who we fight, it is both liberals and conservatives who will pay the price for bargaining with terrorists.  These terrorism troops have no desire to play nice with others and they are the equals of Hitler's storm troopers...taking horrific orders and executing them with stunning simplicity.  While conservatives are attacked for being Bible thumpers, what do you call Islamic jihadi-cool initiates...Quran Quacks?  Of course not, because that would not be politically correct speech.  We wouldn't want to call evil, you know, EVIL?  That wouldn't be polite and more importantly...it might hurt their feelings.  I doubt it would hurt their feelings any more than it would hurt your neck as they begin to hack away, but that is another issue isn't it?

What is clear is that these people are not criminals, but soldiers fighting their own holy war.  If we had a strong President, he would not have waited for these situations, but would have carpet bombed ISIS while they were marching in columns months ago.  Now they have returned to the guerrilla tactics that make them much harder to stamp out.

While we worry about whether or not we are practicing gentlemanly war or are Islamophobes and speaking with correct verbiage, innocents are having their heads sawed off with six inch knives.  Do not kid yourself.  This is not going to stay overseas.  Eventually they will be here in the United States playing the same game because we are too scared to call them what they are: evil.  Only evil will take an independent journalist and commit this atrocity and do not think they will not do the same here.

That is the issue we face.  Do you get it now?


Saturday, August 23, 2014

Man Bites Dog And Journalism Bites Kids


Sorry, I am about to be a giant pain in the little league carcass, but my vitriol is not pointed at them...just ESPN and the journalists who cover the games in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. For the past several weeks, there has been a coronation in process of Mo'Ne Davis, a thirteen year old female Little League World Series player from Philadelphia whose team was eliminated Thursday from Championship contention.

What bothers me about this story is first off, she is thirteen, so is there any possibility we could as another writer put it "let her future wait until it actually arrives."  The last phenom of this nature was a kid named Danny Almonte who was later found to be too old to be playing where he was.

I am not proposing Miss Davis is any older than she and her parents say she is, but one thing I will say is little league baseball whether Big L or little L should be about celebrating youth baseball, not a player who wants to become the starting point guard on the UConn basketball team.

Second, is she really that good?  Let me take it a step further.  Sure, she had a no hitter at the Little League World Series.  And?  I have a kid with four no hitters including a twelve strikeout, four inning Perfect Game.  Is she a better pitcher because there were TV cameras to capture it?  I have to go with no...not because mine is better, but because you didn't see them play one another which would give you a better clue as to who is and who isn't.

ESPN does a great deal promoting its product.  That doesn't mean though that these kids are better than kids down the street.  Honestly, just in the Dallas/Fort Worth area I can think of a half dozen teams who I would put up against any team in the Little League World Series and they would win.  Any.

I doubt it will happen because Little League teams do not play USSSA teams or Cal Ripken League teams.  They each have slight rules variations to make them different.

The point is give me my 11 year old because Miss Davis' fastball looks fast because she is throwing from a mound forty some feet away.  She is thirteen.  My eleven year old throws from a mound fifty plus back.  If you don't think there is a difference, try it out.  All of a sudden pitchers become much more hittable...or they don't because they adjust.  However, that is not the man bites dog story journalists want to cover and because of that journalists are invariably objectifying kids whose talent may not be as high as broadcast across the cable airwaves.  What happens when their talent falls back to reality?

While there are lots of discussions about how Miss Davis and family can cash in on her current fame, it seems that at least her family is keeping things in perspective.  While people clamor for a book deal or sports drink promotion, her step father seems intent on having zero questions about his daughter's eligibility for UConn should that offer materialize in the years to come.  Smart guy focusing on the real prize and not a temporary moment of gratification.

If only we could get the media to entertain the same ideas, but they are too busy creating heroes who may not be ready for the capes being placed on their shoulders.



Speaker-Rose




You're like the thief who isn't the least bit sorry he stole, but is terribly, terribly sorry he's going to jail.- Clark Gable (as Captain Rhett Butler)

Tris Speaker played baseball in the Major Leagues from 1907 - 1928.  While he played a majority of his time in the shadows of Ty Cobb, he holds the record for most career doubles: 792.  He also played during the infamous Black Sox Scandal.  While Mr. Speaker is a Hall of Famer and his lifetime batting average was .345 producing 3514 hits would you allow him in if he had bet on baseball during the scandal that plagued baseball during the 1919 World Series?

Of course not.  Yet for some reason, there seems to be a near constant clamoring for Pete Rose to be reinstated into baseball so that he may be considered for the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Twenty five years ago Pete Rose agreed to be suspended from Major League Baseball for his involvement in betting on the game.  Fay Vincent, the baseball commissioner who replaced Bart Giamatti was eloquent in a recent opinion piece:

"...another person who misses that point is Rose himself. The Hall of Fame pitcher Tom Seaver once asked me the killing question:
"Look Commissioner, if Rose is allowed into the Hall of Fame, does that mean a pitcher like me with over 300 wins can bet on baseball?"
He answered himself by pointing out there cannot be two standards for players — with great players being able to gamble and know the honor and other rewards of the Hall of Fame will still accrue."

Mr. Vincent is right here and it can not be overstated.  It appears again and again that it is Mr. Rose who does not get it.  He did play in more winning games (1972) than anyone else.  Yes, he did have more career hits (4256) than anyone else.  However, the provisions of Major League Baseball Rule 21 on Misconduct is clear:

Any player, umpire, or club official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has no duty to perform shall be declared ineligible for one year.

Any player, umpire, or club or league official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the better has a duty to perform shall be declared permanently ineligible.

Permanently ineligible.  What exactly is the problem Mr. Rose?  Pete Rose can be found every July in Cooperstown hawking autographs in front of local stores while campaigning for being allowed back into baseball, yet it was his autograph that adorned the agreement letter between he and Commissioner Giamatti.

Beyond the rule itself, John Dowd, the man who investigated the situation and wrote the infamous report named after him said "Rose probably did bet against the Reds."

Even if he did not bet against his team, by betting on some games to win and other games he did not bet at all, he indicates to his bookies that the game might be a probable loss.  He might manage differently.  As Ryan Rodenberg's explains in his recent Atlantic piece, Pete Rose would likely burn through his pinch runners, hitters, bullpen, and even lineup to get a win if he were betting on them.  What message does it send about his confidence if he bets $100 per game?  How about $1000?

As noted in the Dowd Report, gambling on your team creates the "ultimate conflict of interest in which the individual player/bettor places his personal financial interest above the interests of the team."

As is now clear for all of us, Mr. Rose bet on baseball.  No matter how much he loved the game, he tarnished it by his own selfish actions and it is his actions that keep him out of the Hall of Fame.




Are You Ready For Some Obamacare?


As the NFL season gets ready to descend upon us, I can almost hear the yelp of "Are you ready for some football?"  Unfortunately for the White House and Democrats on the campaign trail though, they should be worried about Obamacare and based on their silence on the issue I am guessing they are.  So are you ready for Obamacare...because it is about to get fun?

(1) You realize that premiums, which have already started going north, are headed for big bumps in 2015.  You get to see them come September 1 when open enrollments begin for folks.  Part of the original political plan to re-elect the President in 2012 was to have all the Obamacare goodies show up early and delay the pain, but the pain starts this year and keeps getting good through 2018 when Cadillac healthcare plans start getting taxed.  Hard.

According to Price-Waterhouse-Coopers, Arkansas, Iowa, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia are all on pace for premium increases between ten and fifteen percent.  Louisiana may be on pace for twenty percent hikes.  I am guessing these will not be good tidings for US Senate candidates in Arkansas, Iowa, or North Carolina.

Premiums will likely go up even further given many of the participants who signed up for coverage, are not paying for it.  The system does not work when healthy young people do not sign up and pay for their coverage.  Maybe they are figuring out that Mr. Obama sold the proverbial pipe dream.

(2) From a practical perspective, not that Mr. Obama is Mr. Practical, he just doesn't get it.  Mr. Obama likes to blame President Bush for a number of issues, but does nothing to correct them.  The economy was bad when Obama was first inaugurated, but he has had the opportunity to correct that.  Instead he has gone out of his way with legislation like Obamacare to discourage employers from employing people.  If you want an improving economy, you do that by helping people get jobs that match their skill set, not by raising the cost of job creation which is exactly what Obamacare does.


(3)  Obamacare supporters keep crying every time a court strikes down requirements that do not allow conscience objections when people who do not want to pay for abortion are forced to...there seems to be no connection between the idea that if you want me out of your body, don't ask me to pay for your body.

In the meantime, Mr. Obama and Company have shown that they have zero understanding that we elected him President, not Emperor, and because of that have zero interest in paying for others' abortions, limiting the size of our sodas, or his wife's inability to allow school bake sales.  Obamacare is one more example of an administration run amok gleeful with its own happy juice of how great they are.

(4) The constitutional law professor we elected should be in for an interesting Supreme Court term, if not this year, then next, as the question of state exchanges gets worked out.  The fact is you had to pass the bill to see what was in it as then Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously quipped.  Unfortunately, the bill was passed and then created by a group of teenagers apparently who either did not understand combinations of equal protection laws, the implications to the tax code, or how healthcare really works.

(5) Finally, returning to Mr. Obama's practicality issue - he missed the boat on keeping your doctor.  You will remember his famous promise that if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.  Meanwhile, because of Obamacare regulations, networks have not gotten bigger, but smaller.  In New Hampshire, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, the only participant in the marketplace gutted ten of the state's twenty-six hospitals from its coverage.  Two in five of you are probably out of luck when it comes to local care if you live in New Hampshire.

So as football season starts, so does the political football season.  This one should be pretty rough and tumble, but on this one, the Xs and Os were designed by the President so while we as a nation lose it is because of the game plan designed by the coach.

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
hat ever happened to Obamacare -- the unpopular healthcare bill that was to be the Republicans big weapon as they battled for control of the Senate this fall?   For sure, the Affordable Care Act has been pushed to the sidelines by the chaos in Iraq, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the surge in Central American minors across our border, the Veterans Administration scandal, the pestilential virus rampaging across the computers of the federal government, and so much more…
Now, the GOP should circle back. There are nine Senate seats described as “toss-ups” by Real Clear Politics, and Obamacare could move the needle in some of those races. The ACA is still a political stink bomb, with Kaiser Family Foundation polling showing only 37 percent of the country views the law favorably – one of its lowest ratings since it passed in 2010.  Some 53 percent of Americans have an unfavorable opinion of the ACA - up a shocking 8 points since June.
Related: Insurers Say Obama’s ‘Fix’ Is Driving Up Premiums
Democrats understandably have neglected to highlight Obamacare on their campaign sites. Instead, for example, North Carolina’s Kay Hagan implores visitors to “Take a Stand Against the Koch Brothers,” which must confuse the uninitiated. Bruce Braley, running in Iowa, focuses on veterans’ issues and the farm bill. Nary a word on Mr. Obama’s legacy issue.
IG: Obamacare’s Medical Device Tax Not Bringing In...
According to a federal report issued Tuesday, Obamacare’s controversial medical device tax isn’t bringing in nearly as much cash as expected. The Treasury inspector general for tax administration found that the...
Several GOP campaign sites go light on Obamacare too. Thom Tillis in North Carolina broadcasts Kay Hagan’s close ties to President Obama, while David Perdue in Georgia emphasizes his business background. Joni Ernst, running neck in neck for the Iowa seat, brags on her front page, “I grew up castrating hogs on an Iowa farm, so in Washington I’ll know how to cut pork.” Some local color.
Other Republicans are following the expected playbook. Scott Brown, campaigning for the New Hampshire seat held by Jeanne Shaheen, goes all in against Obamacare. Ditto Republican Cory Gardner, running an uphill battle against Mark Udall in Colorado, who notes that 335,000 Coloradans lost their policies because of the ACA.
Bill Cassidy, with a light lead against Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, charges that Obamacare is causing that state’s premiums to rise. But Cassidy lists it fifth of five issues, after amnesty, purportedly “illegal” travel expenditures and other missteps by the incumbent.
While local issues vary, Republicans should double down, and remind voters how much they dislike the ACA. Why?
Related: So Far, Obamacare’s Hospital Reform Isn’t Working
1. Big premium hikes are slated for 2015. Because the country erupted in outrage over the millions of policies cancelled under Obamacare, which made a lie of the president’s vow, “If you like your insurance you can keep it,” the White House reversed course and allowed people to maintain existing coverage. As a result, the Obamacare exchanges were starved of the healthier people needed to pay for the sick and poor previously without insurance. Insurers are now planning to raise premiums.
According to PwC Health Research Institute, the average premium increase request for 2105 in North Carolina is 10.8 percent; in Iowa the hike is 11.5 percent. Many in Louisiana are looking at almost a 20 percent increase, and in Arkansas nearly 12 percent. That’s big, unpleasant news for Democrats.
2. Critics claim the Obama administration is fudging the ACA enrollment numbers. The White House trumpeted that 8 million Americans had signed up for Obamacare, but that total has been shrinking. Aetna, one of the program’s biggest players, reports that of their 720,000 enrollees, only about 600,000 are paying for their coverage, a number they expect will drop to about 500,000 by year-end. Other insurers indicate fall-off as well.
3. People are angry about the narrower choices of doctors and hospitals available to them.  In New Hampshire, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the sole insurer participating in the marketplace; it eliminated 10 of the state’s 26 hospitals from its network. According to Politico, such is the uproar about shrinking choices that “since the beginning of 2013, more than 70 bills have been introduced in 22 states to clarify the network rules, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.” In California, more than one group has sued Anthem Blue Cross, charging that the insurer misrepresented the scope of its doctor network.
Related: Up to 300,000 Could Lose Obamacare on Federal Exchange
4. The ACA was constructed incompetently. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled illegal the federal subsidies paid to Obamacare enrollees in states that have not set up their own exchanges -- a stark reminder of how badly the healthcare bill was implemented. This and other unintended consequences are excellent arguments for significantly overhauling the ACA – an undertaking that might be possible under a Republican Senate but that has little or no hope otherwise.
5. Obamacare highlights the president’s imperial tendencies. Mr. Obama has single-handedly changed the ACA some 24 times, delaying important provisions such as the employer and individual mandates. The president has rigged the rollout of the ACA to political advantage, putting off the most painful aspects of the bill and front-loading the goodies. Republicans should remind voters we have yet to encounter, for instance, the 40 percent Cadillac tax, which has been pushed back until 2018, but which is expected to raise as much as $214 billion by 2023.
6. Obamacare undermines job creation. The ACA has been the most important of a number of White House policies that have discouraged job creation at a time when the country is struggling to put people back to work. At last tally, there were 92 million adult Americans who are not working (like stay-at-home moms), are unemployed, retired or disabled. The workforce participation rate is at a decades-long low. This is unsustainable, and Obamacare is not helping. Companies have limited their hiring and also the number of hours their employers work because of the bill and have faced increased uncertainty. Meanwhile, because of the ACA, Americans no longer need to work to get health benefits – maybe a good thing for individuals, but not for a country whose safety net must be funded by an ever-greater workforce.
In short, there’s still meat on the bones of the Obamacare carcass; Republicans running for office should get out their knives and forks.
- See more at: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/08/20/6-Reasons-Obamacare-Can-Win-Senate-GOP#sthash.9It4kWMD.dpuf
at ever happened to Obamacare -- the unpopular healthcare bill that was to be the Republicans big weapon as they battled for control of the Senate this fall?   For sure, the Affordable Care Act has been pushed to the sidelines by the chaos in Iraq, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the surge in Central American minors across our border, the Veterans Administration scandal, the pestilential virus rampaging across the computers of the federal government, and so much more…
Now, the GOP should circle back. There are nine Senate seats described as “toss-ups” by Real Clear Politics, and Obamacare could move the needle in some of those races. The ACA is still a political stink bomb, with Kaiser Family Foundation polling showing only 37 percent of the country views the law favorably – one of its lowest ratings since it passed in 2010.  Some 53 percent of Americans have an unfavorable opinion of the ACA - up a shocking 8 points since June.
Related: Insurers Say Obama’s ‘Fix’ Is Driving Up Premiums
Democrats understandably have neglected to highlight Obamacare on their campaign sites. Instead, for example, North Carolina’s Kay Hagan implores visitors to “Take a Stand Against the Koch Brothers,” which must confuse the uninitiated. Bruce Braley, running in Iowa, focuses on veterans’ issues and the farm bill. Nary a word on Mr. Obama’s legacy issue.
IG: Obamacare’s Medical Device Tax Not Bringing In...
According to a federal report issued Tuesday, Obamacare’s controversial medical device tax isn’t bringing in nearly as much cash as expected. The Treasury inspector general for tax administration found that the...
Several GOP campaign sites go light on Obamacare too. Thom Tillis in North Carolina broadcasts Kay Hagan’s close ties to President Obama, while David Perdue in Georgia emphasizes his business background. Joni Ernst, running neck in neck for the Iowa seat, brags on her front page, “I grew up castrating hogs on an Iowa farm, so in Washington I’ll know how to cut pork.” Some local color.
Other Republicans are following the expected playbook. Scott Brown, campaigning for the New Hampshire seat held by Jeanne Shaheen, goes all in against Obamacare. Ditto Republican Cory Gardner, running an uphill battle against Mark Udall in Colorado, who notes that 335,000 Coloradans lost their policies because of the ACA.
Bill Cassidy, with a light lead against Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, charges that Obamacare is causing that state’s premiums to rise. But Cassidy lists it fifth of five issues, after amnesty, purportedly “illegal” travel expenditures and other missteps by the incumbent.
While local issues vary, Republicans should double down, and remind voters how much they dislike the ACA. Why?
Related: So Far, Obamacare’s Hospital Reform Isn’t Working
1. Big premium hikes are slated for 2015. Because the country erupted in outrage over the millions of policies cancelled under Obamacare, which made a lie of the president’s vow, “If you like your insurance you can keep it,” the White House reversed course and allowed people to maintain existing coverage. As a result, the Obamacare exchanges were starved of the healthier people needed to pay for the sick and poor previously without insurance. Insurers are now planning to raise premiums.
According to PwC Health Research Institute, the average premium increase request for 2105 in North Carolina is 10.8 percent; in Iowa the hike is 11.5 percent. Many in Louisiana are looking at almost a 20 percent increase, and in Arkansas nearly 12 percent. That’s big, unpleasant news for Democrats.
2. Critics claim the Obama administration is fudging the ACA enrollment numbers. The White House trumpeted that 8 million Americans had signed up for Obamacare, but that total has been shrinking. Aetna, one of the program’s biggest players, reports that of their 720,000 enrollees, only about 600,000 are paying for their coverage, a number they expect will drop to about 500,000 by year-end. Other insurers indicate fall-off as well.
3. People are angry about the narrower choices of doctors and hospitals available to them.  In New Hampshire, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the sole insurer participating in the marketplace; it eliminated 10 of the state’s 26 hospitals from its network. According to Politico, such is the uproar about shrinking choices that “since the beginning of 2013, more than 70 bills have been introduced in 22 states to clarify the network rules, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.” In California, more than one group has sued Anthem Blue Cross, charging that the insurer misrepresented the scope of its doctor network.
Related: Up to 300,000 Could Lose Obamacare on Federal Exchange
4. The ACA was constructed incompetently. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled illegal the federal subsidies paid to Obamacare enrollees in states that have not set up their own exchanges -- a stark reminder of how badly the healthcare bill was implemented. This and other unintended consequences are excellent arguments for significantly overhauling the ACA – an undertaking that might be possible under a Republican Senate but that has little or no hope otherwise.
5. Obamacare highlights the president’s imperial tendencies. Mr. Obama has single-handedly changed the ACA some 24 times, delaying important provisions such as the employer and individual mandates. The president has rigged the rollout of the ACA to political advantage, putting off the most painful aspects of the bill and front-loading the goodies. Republicans should remind voters we have yet to encounter, for instance, the 40 percent Cadillac tax, which has been pushed back until 2018, but which is expected to raise as much as $214 billion by 2023.
6. Obamacare undermines job creation. The ACA has been the most important of a number of White House policies that have discouraged job creation at a time when the country is struggling to put people back to work. At last tally, there were 92 million adult Americans who are not working (like stay-at-home moms), are unemployed, retired or disabled. The workforce participation rate is at a decades-long low. This is unsustainable, and Obamacare is not helping. Companies have limited their hiring and also the number of hours their employers work because of the bill and have faced increased uncertainty. Meanwhile, because of the ACA, Americans no longer need to work to get health benefits – maybe a good thing for individuals, but not for a country whose safety net must be funded by an ever-greater workforce.
In short, there’s still meat on the bones of the Obamacare carcass; Republicans running for office should get out their knives and forks.
- See more at: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/08/20/6-Reasons-Obamacare-Can-Win-Senate-GOP#sthash.9It4kWMD.dpuf, N




at ever happened to Obamacare -- the unpopular healthcare bill that was to be the Republicans big weapon as they battled for control of the Senate this fall?   For sure, the Affordable Care Act has been pushed to the sidelines by the chaos in Iraq, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the surge in Central American minors across our border, the Veterans Administration scandal, the pestilential virus rampaging across the computers of the federal government, and so much more…
Now, the GOP should circle back. There are nine Senate seats described as “toss-ups” by Real Clear Politics, and Obamacare could move the needle in some of those races. The ACA is still a political stink bomb, with Kaiser Family Foundation polling showing only 37 percent of the country views the law favorably – one of its lowest ratings since it passed in 2010.  Some 53 percent of Americans have an unfavorable opinion of the ACA - up a shocking 8 points since June.
Related: Insurers Say Obama’s ‘Fix’ Is Driving Up Premiums
Democrats understandably have neglected to highlight Obamacare on their campaign sites. Instead, for example, North Carolina’s Kay Hagan implores visitors to “Take a Stand Against the Koch Brothers,” which must confuse the uninitiated. Bruce Braley, running in Iowa, focuses on veterans’ issues and the farm bill. Nary a word on Mr. Obama’s legacy issue.
IG: Obamacare’s Medical Device Tax Not Bringing In...
According to a federal report issued Tuesday, Obamacare’s controversial medical device tax isn’t bringing in nearly as much cash as expected. The Treasury inspector general for tax administration found that the...
Several GOP campaign sites go light on Obamacare too. Thom Tillis in North Carolina broadcasts Kay Hagan’s close ties to President Obama, while David Perdue in Georgia emphasizes his business background. Joni Ernst, running neck in neck for the Iowa seat, brags on her front page, “I grew up castrating hogs on an Iowa farm, so in Washington I’ll know how to cut pork.” Some local color.
Other Republicans are following the expected playbook. Scott Brown, campaigning for the New Hampshire seat held by Jeanne Shaheen, goes all in against Obamacare. Ditto Republican Cory Gardner, running an uphill battle against Mark Udall in Colorado, who notes that 335,000 Coloradans lost their policies because of the ACA.
Bill Cassidy, with a light lead against Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, charges that Obamacare is causing that state’s premiums to rise. But Cassidy lists it fifth of five issues, after amnesty, purportedly “illegal” travel expenditures and other missteps by the incumbent.
While local issues vary, Republicans should double down, and remind voters how much they dislike the ACA. Why?
Related: So Far, Obamacare’s Hospital Reform Isn’t Working
1. Big premium hikes are slated for 2015. Because the country erupted in outrage over the millions of policies cancelled under Obamacare, which made a lie of the president’s vow, “If you like your insurance you can keep it,” the White House reversed course and allowed people to maintain existing coverage. As a result, the Obamacare exchanges were starved of the healthier people needed to pay for the sick and poor previously without insurance. Insurers are now planning to raise premiums.
According to PwC Health Research Institute, the average premium increase request for 2105 in North Carolina is 10.8 percent; in Iowa the hike is 11.5 percent. Many in Louisiana are looking at almost a 20 percent increase, and in Arkansas nearly 12 percent. That’s big, unpleasant news for Democrats.
2. Critics claim the Obama administration is fudging the ACA enrollment numbers. The White House trumpeted that 8 million Americans had signed up for Obamacare, but that total has been shrinking. Aetna, one of the program’s biggest players, reports that of their 720,000 enrollees, only about 600,000 are paying for their coverage, a number they expect will drop to about 500,000 by year-end. Other insurers indicate fall-off as well.
3. People are angry about the narrower choices of doctors and hospitals available to them.  In New Hampshire, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield was the sole insurer participating in the marketplace; it eliminated 10 of the state’s 26 hospitals from its network. According to Politico, such is the uproar about shrinking choices that “since the beginning of 2013, more than 70 bills have been introduced in 22 states to clarify the network rules, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.” In California, more than one group has sued Anthem Blue Cross, charging that the insurer misrepresented the scope of its doctor network.
Related: Up to 300,000 Could Lose Obamacare on Federal Exchange
4. The ACA was constructed incompetently. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled illegal the federal subsidies paid to Obamacare enrollees in states that have not set up their own exchanges -- a stark reminder of how badly the healthcare bill was implemented. This and other unintended consequences are excellent arguments for significantly overhauling the ACA – an undertaking that might be possible under a Republican Senate but that has little or no hope otherwise.
5. Obamacare highlights the president’s imperial tendencies. Mr. Obama has single-handedly changed the ACA some 24 times, delaying important provisions such as the employer and individual mandates. The president has rigged the rollout of the ACA to political advantage, putting off the most painful aspects of the bill and front-loading the goodies. Republicans should remind voters we have yet to encounter, for instance, the 40 percent Cadillac tax, which has been pushed back until 2018, but which is expected to raise as much as $214 billion by 2023.
6. Obamacare undermines job creation. The ACA has been the most important of a number of White House policies that have discouraged job creation at a time when the country is struggling to put people back to work. At last tally, there were 92 million adult Americans who are not working (like stay-at-home moms), are unemployed, retired or disabled. The workforce participation rate is at a decades-long low. This is unsustainable, and Obamacare is not helping. Companies have limited their hiring and also the number of hours their employers work because of the bill and have faced increased uncertainty. Meanwhile, because of the ACA, Americans no longer need to work to get health benefits – maybe a good thing for individuals, but not for a country whose safety net must be funded by an ever-greater workforce.
In short, there’s still meat on the bones of the Obamacare carcass; Republicans running for office should get out their knives and forks.
- See more at: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/08/20/6-Reasons-Obamacare-Can-Win-Senate-GOP#sthash.9It4kWMD.dp