Thursday, April 17, 2014

If You Like Your School Board, You Can Keep Your School Board



Do you remember the now famous words "You can keep your doctor if you like your doctor"?  How about "you have to pass the bill to find out what is in it?"  In 2010, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told us the Affordable Care Act would be a good thing even though no one knew any specifics.

No, I am not here to argue the merits of the Affordable Care Act.  I will argue that the same lack of transparency has invaded the discussion to reform DallasISD.

I am told over and over I should sign a petition started by a group that thinks we need school reform. This new group would reform the Dallas "Independent" School System to a system managed by unelected School Board members.   I am ready for reform, but I am not ready for fixes that don't fix.  Are you?

A few problems exist here with Mayor Rawlings and his crony capitalism friends who are pushing reform.  At public meetings, no one from the Support Our Public Schools coalition can describe what a new governing structure would solve that our current school board can not.

For instance, do you support ending counseling in schools or vocational education programs?  If so, 
you should sign onto the petition.

Do you believe that low student to teacher ratios are a thing of the past? Maybe five year old children don't need individualized attention?  If you sign onto the SOPS petition, you can get higher ratios.  Maybe we can warehouse forty kindergarteners into a room per teacher until we warehouse them in prison.  That is a reform option if we move away from state standards.  That's right.  This group seems to think that state standards on student to teacher ratios is inappropriate.

I note with interest that this is called a home rule effort.  Home rule meaning no state standards, but not real home rule.

An option should this come to the ballot is the removal of elected school board members.  Has Crimea come to Dallas?  Where in the world are people crying out take away my ability to vote?  According to Rawlings and Co. only in Dallas.

Who out there thinks they don't need to elect their representative to the school board?  I know Mike Morath thinks not electing school board members is a good idea.  This is the same school board member who was invited to give a commencement address.  He then invited a group of the students toauthorize him to sit down and skip an address.  This type sophomoric behavior is exactly the problem with those promoting "education reform."

Morath had no suggestions for graduating seniors.  His SOPS colleagues have no suggestions on reforming DISD.  He wasn't trying to guide the students to success, just smile for the cameras like a Ken doll.

Instead he and Mayor Rawlings suggest voters are unnecessary for the selection of a school board.  Maybe they have a short memory, but how long ago was it this city and state were disenfranchising voters based on the color of their skin?

That's right.  Our collective history is not all that impressive when it comes to who gets to vote.  History repeats and now it appears a group of white, upper class folks in the nice part of town want to choose who gets to pick the school board.

Well this is one program for which I don't need to see a rerun.  The school reform effort will be better off when the SOPS supporters realize that most of Dallas does not want to turn back the clock.  We want a program that is about us and not them.  Then we can start a real discussion of school reform.


No comments:

Post a Comment